<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>https://libdoc.whz.de/opus4</title>
    <description>OPUS documents</description>
    <link>https://libdoc.whz.de/opus4/index/index/</link>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 Mar 2024 10:13:43 +0100</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 Mar 2024 10:13:43 +0100</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>Teleproctoring for Training in Structural Heart Interventions: Initial Real‐World Experience During the COVID‐19 Pandemic</title>
      <link>https://libdoc.whz.de/opus4/frontdoor/index/index/docId/16878</link>
      <description>Background: Proctoring represents a cornerstone in the acquisition of state‐of‐the‐art cardiovascular interventions. Yet, travel restrictions and containment measures during the COVID‐19 pandemic limited on‐site proctoring for training and expert support in interventional cardiology.&#13;
&#13;
Methods and Results: We established a teleproctoring setup for training in a novel patent foramen ovale closure device system (NobleStitch EL, HeartStitch Inc, Fountain Valley, CA) at our institution using web‐based real‐time bidirectional audiovisual communication. A total of 6 patients with prior paradoxical embolic stroke and a right‐to‐left shunt of grade 2 or 3 were treated under remote proctorship after 3 cases were performed successfully under on‐site proctorship. No major device/procedure‐related adverse events occurred, and none of the patients had a residual right‐to‐left shunt of grade 1 or higher after the procedure. Additionally, we sought to provide an overview of current evidence available for teleproctoring in interventional cardiology. Literature review was performed identifying 6 previous reports on teleproctoring for cardiovascular interventions, most of which were related to the current COVID‐19 pandemic. In all reports, teleproctoring was carried out in similar settings with comparable setups; no major adverse events were reported.&#13;
&#13;
Conclusions: Teleproctoring may represent a feasible and safe tool for location‐independent and cost‐effective training in a novel patent foramen ovale closure device system. Future prospective trials comparing teleproctoring with traditional on‐site proctoring are warranted.</description>
      <author>Niklas Beyhoff; Miry Zhu; Lukas Zanders; David M. Leistner; Anthony Nobles; Mark Schroeder; Fabian Barbieri; Ulf Landmesser; Markus Reinthaler</author>
      <category>article</category>
      <guid>https://libdoc.whz.de/opus4/frontdoor/index/index/docId/16878</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Mar 2024 10:13:43 +0100</pubDate>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
